Skip to content

ADGEEK

Kulfi Collective’s business across branded content and owned IP

Advait Gupt discusses Kulfi Collective’s bootstrapped model, procurement and the economics of original IP, alongside creator communities, immersive experiences and the pressures of quick commerce and AI.

The conversation

Episode 25

What happens when an agency refuses to call itself an agency? In our silver jubilee episode, Vishal sits down with Advait Gupt, Co-Founder & CEO of Kulfi Collective, the Mumbai-based creative powerhouse behind Supari Studios and brand work for Spotify, Netflix, Crocs, Nothing, LEGO, Red Bull, and CRED.

Advait unpacks how Kulfi stayed bootstrapped while peers chased eye-watering valuations, what changes now that Divya Karani has joined as chairperson, and why the company sits in the awkward, beautiful space between branded content, original IP, and immersive experiences.

The conversation goes deep on the commercial model behind a collective, the procurement problem that's quietly reshaping Indian advertising, the rise of dark social and creator-led communities, the q-commerce squeeze on creative canvases, owned-IP economics, the so-called “independence tax" of the AI era, and what brand building could look like in 2027 if AI-led search reduces exposure to ads and websites.

Plus: how a frozen dessert became the name of one of India's most exciting creative companies.

Key Takeaways

  1. Kulfi moved towards deeper relationships with fewer brands because project-only production limited revenue visibility; retainers and a smaller revenue-share component now complement projects, Gupt says.
  2. Gupt prefers a defined business problem to a request for a viral campaign, while acknowledging that demonstrating creative value to procurement still requires client education.
  3. Spotify work centres on artist–fan connections and genre communities; reported engagement gains should be distinguished from business outcomes the work hopes to support.
  4. Brands should show up authentically where communities converse, Gupt argues, even when every interaction cannot be tracked; offline experiences can feed continuing online discussion.
  5. An integrated client offer can draw on specialist partners as needed, rather than putting every capability on the payroll.
  6. After difficulties building wholly owned IP, Kulfi is exploring co-building with startup and individual brands; Gupt presents this as an opportunity under development.
  7. Kulfi’s creator ecosystem includes creative crafts as well as influencers. Gupt sees shared goals as central to collaboration and retention, without claiming that alignment is easy to sustain.
  8. Gupt says linking cultural relevance to business impact remains a struggle; better attribution is necessary to defend the value of creative work.

Additional subjects

Editorial analysis

An editorial interpretation of the conversation, distinguishing the guest’s arguments from verified business outcomes.


Longer relationships, more predictable capacity


Advait Gupt describes Kulfi Collective as a creative studio helping brands build cultural relevance through content, communities and experiences. His route into advertising began after investment banking and venture capital, when he joined his brother Akshat in making a short film and then building a content business. Brand work initially paid the bills. Kulfi deliberately stayed bootstrapped, he says, but now seeks institutional scale; he credits chairperson Divya Karani with helping the company understand the foundations required for that ambition.


From viral requests to business problems


The commercial model has evolved from individual production projects towards deeper relationships with fewer brands. Gupt says project work offered attractive margins but limited revenue visibility, with each year effectively starting again. Retainers now sit alongside projects and a smaller revenue-share component intended to align incentives around outcomes. He prefers a defined business problem to a request for a viral campaign. Work that demonstrates value can help procurement conversations, although educating clients remains necessary. For Spotify, he describes a strategy of bringing artists closer to fans and building communities around genre-based properties; he distinguishes engagement results from business outcomes the work hopes to support.


Culture and the artist–fan relationship


Gupt argues that brands need to participate where conversations happen, even when every interaction cannot be tracked. Connecting offline experiences with online discussion is part of that approach. He sees integrated service and specialist collectives as compatible: one partner can coordinate a wider offer without employing every specialist. Cultural nuance also shapes Kulfi’s client appeal, particularly for global technology brands adapting to India’s varied audiences. On quick commerce, his view is that budgets follow attention rather than simply disappear, so studios must identify where their capabilities can remain useful.


Specialists, creators and the challenge of IP


Owned IP has been difficult for a bootstrapped services business, Gupt acknowledges. Kulfi is exploring co-building and co-ownership, especially with younger founder-led and individual brands, rather than claiming an established success model. He defines creators broadly to include designers, animators, directors and writers, and treats collaborators’ independent ventures as potential added capability. Retention depends on shared goals and delivering on them, which he says is harder in practice. Measurement remains a challenge: linking cultural relevance to business value is a goal, not a solved attribution system. His optimism about AI rests on continuing human emotion and changing behaviours, with brands finding new ways to play meaningful roles.

Questions & answers

Why did Kulfi move towards fewer, deeper brand relationships?


Kulfi moved towards deeper relationships with fewer brands because project-only production limited revenue visibility; retainers and a smaller revenue-share component now complement projects, Gupt says.


What makes a business problem a better brief than “go viral”?


Gupt prefers a defined business problem to a request for a viral campaign, while acknowledging that demonstrating creative value to procurement still requires client education.


What was distinctive about the Spotify artist–fan approach?


Spotify work centres on artist–fan connections and genre communities; reported engagement gains should be distinguished from business outcomes the work hopes to support.


Must every instance of cultural participation be measurable?


Brands should show up authentically where communities converse, Gupt argues, even when every interaction cannot be tracked; offline experiences can feed continuing online discussion.


What changed in Kulfi’s approach to developing intellectual property?


After difficulties building wholly owned IP, Kulfi is exploring co-building with startup and individual brands; Gupt presents this as an opportunity under development.

Sources & attribution

Original publisher audio (archived enclosure): Original publisher audio (archived enclosure).


Podcast episode on Spotify: Podcast episode on Spotify.


Podcast video on YouTube: Podcast video on YouTube.


Original publication: The Indian AdGeek, Episode 25, featuring Advait Gupt; original publisher date: 2026-05-10.


Method and attribution: This analysis and the five Q&As are editorial syntheses, not verbatim statements or substitutes for listening to the original conversation. Guest judgments, examples, forecasts and reported business metrics should not be confused with independently audited findings. Research timestamps do not represent podcast chapter timings.

THE INDIAN GEEK

Aviation connects the world.
Advertising shapes how we see it.